You have been meaning to start it for two years.
The money is there. The time is there, sitting in the evenings you spend scrolling.
What is stopping you is about eleven people.
Two colleagues. A former manager. The friend who is doing well. Your brother. The group chat that has known you since school.
None of them have asked about it. None of them are waiting for it. Not one of them would think about it for longer than nine seconds.
The fear of being judged is doing all the work here, and it is being paid to people who are not thinking about you.
And every one of them is sitting at the back of your mind when you go to publish the first version.
Every skill has an ugly period. The first fifty articles are thin. The first twenty videos are stiff and far too long. The first version of anything you build is embarrassing in ways you cannot see yet and will see with total clarity in a year.
That period is fixed. Nothing shortens it. Not planning. Not another course. Not another year of research.
The only part you control is who gets to watch.
You can start a side project without telling anyone, and not one thing about the work itself gets worse for it.
Nobody skips the ugly year. Some people have the sense to serve it in private.
THE FIRST YEAR IS UGLY. IT IS MEANT TO BE
Nobody starts good.
The gap between what you can recognise as good and what you can actually produce is at its widest on the first day. Volume closes it. Thirty attempts, most of them weak, and somewhere around the twentieth the work stops making you wince.
Under an invented name, those are thirty attempts. Building in private buys you all thirty. Building in public buys you an audience for the first three.
Under your own, each one is a small public statement about your judgement, made in front of people who price you professionally. The client paying you $8,000 a month sees the rough early work. Your manager sees it. People you went to school with see it and say nothing at all, which is worse.
So you protect yourself.
You research the market. You buy the domain. You redesign the logo twice. You call it being thorough.
And you publish nothing for a year, and finish that year with exactly the skill you started it with.
A NOVELIST RAN THIS EXPERIMENT AND ALMOST GOT AWAY WITH IT
In 1977, a novelist whose name already guaranteed a print run started publishing under a different one.
Richard Bachman. No author photograph. A thin invented biography. No interviews, no tour, no publicity budget worth the name.
Stephen King wanted an answer to a question you have asked yourself in some form. Was the work any good, or was it the name on the cover?
Bachman sold quietly for eight years. Four novels. Decent reviews. No crowds.
Then a bookstore clerk in Washington read an advance copy, thought the sentences sounded familiar, and went into the copyright filings for the earlier Bachman books. Sitting on the paperwork for the first one was the name of Stephen King's own literary agent.
Thinner had sold about 28,000 copies as a Bachman book. With King's name on the cover, it sold ten times that.
Twenty-eight thousand hardbacks is a solid year for a new novelist and a rounding error for King.
Both numbers are the point.
The 28,000 proved the writing stood up with no reputation behind it. The 280,000 proved exactly what the reputation was worth once he decided to spend it.
He bought a clean read on his own ability. The price was a made-up name and a few years of quiet.
This content is only available to subscribers
Subscribe now and have access to all our stories, enjoy exclusive content and stay up to date with constant updates.
Unlock contentAlready have an account? Sign In
