There is a peculiar paralysis that afflicts intelligent people. They gather information, weigh options, consider consequences, and then gather more information. Six months pass. The opportunity closes. They tell themselves they were being thorough, strategic, careful. What they were actually being was afraid.
Jeff Bezos recognised this pattern at Amazon and gave it a name. He divided decisions into two categories: Type 1 and Type 2. Type 1 decisions are one-way doors. Once you walk through, you cannot come back, or the cost of return is severe. Type 2 decisions are two-way doors. You can walk through, look around, and if you hate what you see, walk right back out.
The insight seems obvious once stated. But here is where it gets interesting. Most people, particularly smart people with good analytical instincts, treat almost every decision as if it were Type 1. They apply the same rigorous deliberation to taking a new job as they would to selling their company. They agonise over moving cities with the same intensity they should reserve for having children. And in doing so, they confuse caution with wisdom.
The real skill is not in making better decisions. It is in correctly classifying which kind of decision you are facing.
The Classification Problem
Consider someone spending eight months deciding whether to take a job in Berlin. They make spreadsheets. They interview people who have made similar moves. They calculate cost-of-living differentials and map out career trajectories. When asked what would happen if they took the job and hated it, the question itself seems absurd.
"I can't just quit after a few months. That would look terrible."
But they could. People change jobs all the time. The CV gap would be minimal. The moving costs would be maybe six thousand dollars round-trip. In the worst case, six months would be lost, along with the lesson that Berlin was not the right fit. This is valuable information purchased at a relatively low price.
This is treating a two-way door like a one-way door, and the misclassification costs not just time, but optionality. Every month spent deliberating is a month that could have been spent learning whether Berlin was right. The information needed exists on the other side of the decision, not in further analysis.
This pattern repeats everywhere. The entrepreneur who spends a year planning a business instead of building a minimum viable product and testing it. The writer who deliberates about starting a newsletter instead of just writing three posts and seeing if anyone cares. The person who researches moving to the countryside for so long that they forget why they wanted to leave the city in the first place.
This content is only available to subscribers
Subscribe now and have access to all our stories, enjoy exclusive content and stay up to date with constant updates.
Unlock contentAlready have an account? Sign In
